Aaron R. Hanlon, a writer for
The New Republic, writes a provocative piece addressing the idea of political
correctness which has spread across college campuses all over the United
States. He analyzes both sides of the political correctness debate and highlights
a number of rules we as a society can try to abide by. The issue at large is
not so simple. It is very nuanced and there are not a lot of solutions but
Hanlon gives us a few we should staunchly support.
Hanlon’s four magic rules to
solving the political correctness debate are concise in what they hope to
accomplish.
Colleges
should promote the exercising of free speech by promoting discussion of how to
solve the genuine problems of access, opportunity, safety, and inclusion on
campus.[1]
Besides advocating for
proactive discussions as opposed to outright suppression of ideas one does not
side with, Hanlon proposes that trigger warnings should neither be required or
banned. I think this is important to note because it encourages an air of
openness and neutrality on college campuses. Freeing the college atmosphere
from bias can do this issue a world of good. Hanlon’s simplification of the
term ‘safe space’ helps American society to explore options of a middle ground
of sorts for its college campuses.
Classrooms,
too, can be safe spaces in a specific and important sense: They are training
grounds for civil and civic discourse, shaped inevitably by the political and
cultural standards outside of the classroom. Classrooms need to be places where
every student—regardless of political orientation, race, creed, and
gender—feels like they can safely participate, interact, and learn. But if what
passes as a “conservative” viewpoint is dehumanizing language about LGBTQ
people, or if what passes as a “liberal” viewpoint is “white men are inherently
evil,” then professors should indeed caution against such unproductive speech.(1)
Ultimately, safe zones should
exist depending on the context. Within these safe zones, there must be a
presence of constructive thought, as opposed to shooting down perspectives
students may not agree with. Hanlon’s final rule is that both sides on the political
correctness divide should have the freedom to articulate their opinions.
Colleges
should not be places of censorship, but of “critical inquiry” (to use a
University of Chicago term). Administrators, faculty, and students should all
be in discussion about who gets a campus platform, and why. It’s also
reasonable for that discussion to culminate sometimes in the decision not to
invite—or even to disinvite—a speaker. An invitation to speak on a college
campus doesn’t come with a promise of immunity from protest.(1)
Hanlon and I agree on several
viewpoints. College campuses should not suppress either side of the political
correctness debate. Instead, they should foster intellectual and productive
discussions over issues at hand. Administrators, professors, and those who are
in direct contact with groups of students should encourage critical inquiry of
both sides of the argument and stimulate an understanding of one another as
opposed to a harsh divide. It is biased and narrow-minded to suppress ideas
that one opposes. College students in general should have the ability to feel
safe at school and taking that into account, safe enough to talk about their
views openly, without fear of ridicule and insults from their peers.
I definitely think the idea of "safe spaces" in academic settings has been taken too far in today's world. Healthy debate and contrasting opinions are what make classrooms academic settings. It's productive. But where do we draw the line? Should things like trigger warnings be appropriate when talking about sexual assault because of the post traumatic stress associated with the topic? I think conservative and liberal opinions should be welcomed in classrooms. But maybe sometimes safe spaces are necessary? All around an interesting, ongoing debate in higher education. Great post!
ReplyDeleteI definitely think the idea of "safe spaces" in academic settings has been taken too far in today's world. Healthy debate and contrasting opinions are what make classrooms academic settings. It's productive. But where do we draw the line? Should things like trigger warnings be appropriate when talking about sexual assault because of the post traumatic stress associated with the topic? I think conservative and liberal opinions should be welcomed in classrooms. But maybe sometimes safe spaces are necessary? All around an interesting, ongoing debate in higher education. Great post!
ReplyDeleteI think the topic of political correctness is especially interesting, in particular now that it is being deeply challenged in this year's elections. I do find the UChicago term "critical inquiry" a bit problematic because what constitutes critical inquiry? I don't think, and I hope most people would agree, that "critical inquiry" means the use of racial slurs, homophobic slurs, or outright misogyny in a classroom or on campus. I agree with you that a college campus, above all other spaces, is an important place for students to be challenged and debates to ensue. But safe spaces are necessary for people who feel marginalized or discriminated against. Yes, maybe they won't get that in the real world, but if we can foster a culture of kindness and reasonable political correctness on campus, maybe they real world after college will then become a better place. College changes your ways of thinking and whether that be butting heads with someone across the aisle in class, or grasping a better understanding that certain things shouldn't be said in public spaces, those are all beneficial to the college experience.
ReplyDelete-Allison Bowen
Your post definitely gets to what I think should be the ultimate goal: academia itself should be a "safe space," where debate is encouraged and preconceived biases are challenged. Large colleges and universities attract students from all over the country and the world, and its often the first contact young adults have with peers from different political, economic and cultural backgrounds. Instead of further encouraging divisions within those student bodies, these institutions should have the long-term vision in mind of a diverse yet interconnected campus.
ReplyDeleteOf course, many events of the last few years (including the election) show just how daunting that goal is. While more liberal campuses and metropolises are combatting microaggressions and transphobia, much of America still grapples with self-segregation and blatant xenophobia. Even our "most progressive" centers struggle for political correctness in an era where calling yourself an ally isn't enough. In that sense, I understand why minority circles need more safe spaces to field their discussions and express this frustration. Ultimately, I hope there comes a day that college campuses foster that haven across the board, and higher education represents a broadening of horizons for all of its students.